Home Page
Additional Links
Airworthiness Directives
Articles
CAF News
CAF Objectives
Check Pilot Meeting
Contacts
FAST Fundamentals
Forms
Future Clinics
Knowledge Base
Leadership
Members
Membership
Newsletters
Previous Clinics
Videos
|
|
Looking
Back
By
Charles D.
“Tad” Foran, Lt./Col. USAFR (Ret)
THE GENISIS
On
December 5, 1985
, C.A.F. Col. Guy Joe Smith checked me out in SNJ-5 N30JF at Hartlee
Field, a grass strip northeast of
Denton
,
Texas
. I hadn’t flown a T-6/SNJ since about 1958. (27 years!) The first
thing that struck me was that it still had the peculiar odor that seems
to identify certain old airplanes. (A “Gooney bird cockpit smells like
leather, sweat, and old cigarette smoke). The owner, Alan Clark, was
kind enough to let me fly his SNJ anytime I wanted and eventually I
bought if from him and kept it in my hangar at
Addison
Airport
.
Sometime in the late 1980’s Tim Cullum, a fellow C.A.F. member
and former young clerk in the 181st Fighter Squadron, invited
me to lunch at the Dallas Country Club. ( I should have “smelled a
rat” since I don’t get invited to the DCC very often)
During the course of lunch, Tim asked me if I would
be interested in “revitalizing” the C.A,F,’s TRARON Squadron. He
had been one of the original participants in the TRARON concept. I
was humbled that he would consider me qualified but was interested in
implementing some ideas that I felt would be a contribution. TRARON had
been active for some time but was suffering from a lack of leadership.
The previous Leaders had done a good job but had “moved on” and the
T-34 organization had the resources in their training manual that made
“getting back in business” a matter of communicating with those that
were interested.
BACKGROUND STUFF
The first airplane I ever
flew was a U.S. Air Force T-6D at Waco AFB (Later to be James Connally
AFB) in the summer of 1949. I was in one of the early Air Force Cadet
Classes, 50A, that were started after the U.S. Army Air Corps became the
United States Air Force. Initially we still wore the old Army Air Corps
uniforms until the “blue suit” came on the scene in the winter or
1949. We didn’t know it, but we
were an experimental project to see if you could take a 20 year old and
start teaching them to fly in a T-6, eliminating the Primary and Basic phases of instruction.
(After about 100 hours, we started flying F-51 Mustangs at Las Vegas
AFB, later to be named Nellis) Needless
to say, the fatality rate was somewhat high, not to mention the numerous
wing tips that were replaced! During my four years of active duty I
flew, F-51D’s, T-6D’s (mostly at
Craig
AFB
Pilot
Instructor
School
) , B-25’s, C-47’s, and T-29’s. I joined the Texas ANG in March of
1953 and resumed flying T-6’s along with F-80’s, F-86’s, and
F-84F’s. Almost all flights were in formation, sometimes in weather
and often at night. I flew in the Texas ANG for 22 years, the last seven
in KC-97’s. (Flying night formation in weather in that BUF could get
exciting!) I flew a Beech Baron in my business for about twenty years. I
flew SNJ N04JF for 21 years, selling my ownership October of 2006.
After agreeing to attempt
at rejuvenating TRARON, I was fortunate to have several volunteers meet
with me and put together a plan. The
goal was to eventually have everyone that showed up at an air show or
any gathering where formation was to be performed,
to be qualified. In those days, anyone with an airplane and the
ego/guts to “fly formation” would be included in a formation. The
night air show at
Oklahoma City
was exciting to say the least! Unfortunately the fatal accident rate at
air shows and “photo ops” was atrocious! Unless a pilot had former
military experience or good civilian instruction, the concepts of
“energy”, “geometry” and “anticipation” were mysteries. Even
some of the former military pilots were weak in the basics, which
surprised me. I’d been out of active military flying for about ten
years and I guess some military pilot programs did not stress formation
flying. (Don’t know?)
Vaughn Olson, Sid Snedeker, and
Hank
Castle
were early sources of ideas and concepts. Both Olson and Snedeker were
former “Marine Aviators” but other than that, they were OK. (Just
kidding) We agreed that the “basics” were not being emphasized and
that flying formation was not just a matter of “station keeping” but
that the whole process was one of dynamics. Position in the formation
had been the area of concentration versus the over all picture, i.e. “Total
situation awareness”. Rules
are fine and needed, but a truly proficient formation pilot needs to
understand ALL of the dynamics
involved. The “Rules” are complied with by using the dynamics of
the situation. The program that was developed stressed the origins of
why formation was originally created for purposes of combat and why the
“element”/”section” was the greatest contribution to managing a
flight of four. Soon afterwards, many dedicated individuals spent their
time and money assisting in this program. Marty Case, Randy Wilson,
Randy Presley, Eric Clifford and many others were also involved in
contributing their time and facilities to the very early stages of the
effort.
CONCLUSION
Today the requirements for
being formation qualified at air shows and the programs available for
learning the “art of formation” is a dream come true. The concept of
the FAST Program was brilliant. I am honored to have participated in the
rewarding experience of helping those less fortunate than I had been to
experience the satisfaction of flying a professional and safe formation
flight.
PERSONAL
OBSERVATION
It is important that
voluntary formation activity be FUN!
It is also important that it be SAFE!
It is my impression that at times the RULES are used as “bludgeon”,
to some extent. IF the flight is briefed with the emphasis on the role
of the “element” or “section” vs “You’re #2, you’re #3,
you’re #4” etc. IF the Lead can concentrate on the macro situation
and the #3 (element lead) uses
his situational awareness as regards the flight, #2 and #4 have the role
of flying their “lead’s wing”. This gives the flight the
flexibility to handle virtually any un-briefed or unexpected turn of
events. I think this “philosophy” should be strongly implemented
because it simplifies the management of the flight and contributes to
the over all safety. Since airplanes only have left and right wings,
joining on the wing that’s not occupied makes things pretty simple.
Best regards and “check
your six”!
Tad Foran,
November 9, 2006
Published in the NATA Magazine.
|